williamssl
Steers and Queers 
Posts 7137
Registered 1-11-2004 Location Hippieville Member Is Offline Mood: Fuck USC
|
| posted on 2-3-2016 at 06:46 PM |
|
|
The Road to WrestleMania 32
Starting a thread to somewhat consolidate WM32-related topics:
Rumored / projected / real card.
What I would do differently/how I would book it.
Shitting all over everything because WRESTLEMANIA and VINCE and whatnot
It's all over the place right now (Rumorz + weekly Raw threads)We've done this the past 2-3 years and it's seemingly worked, so
I'm resurrecting the concept.
I was originally planning on going to WM32. I lived in Dallas for 11 years before moving to Seattle, and I moved right before JerryWorld opened and I
hadn't been back for any sporting-type event. I was a little slow on the draw when tickets went on sale and was only finding obstructed view
seats through Ticketmaster, so I didn't purchase them and planned on either doing resale market or seeing if they released more tickets as the
event got closer.
I'm glad that I didn't end up getting tickets because this is not one that I would want to pay that much money for (family of 3 airfare +
tickets + all the food/lodging/etc stuff that comes with travel) - would have been ~$2K when all was said and done.
I'm perfectly content to watch this one at home (or another local location) with friends on the WWE network and end up spending $100 on food
drinks etc. There isn't anything on the card at this point that I would call "must see." I'm not saying it's a shit card or that
it doesn't have the potential to shape up into something decent, but it's too big a stretch to go from where it's looking now to
"must see / event of the year" type thing.
EDIT: The card that people are discussing
Reigns vs. HHH - WWE World Heavyweight Championship title
Lesnar vs. Wyatt (or Wyatt family or something Wyatt-y)
Undertaker vs. ....... Strowman's name is for some reason out there and I'm not believing this
Flair vs. Lynch vs. Banks - triple threat for Divas Championship (this will be good).
Do we get a MITB Ladder match? Lot's of people who could play in this one and make for a nice little match and spotfest.
Because we have TAG TEAMS!!! and nothing that I would call a hardcore rivalry going on (Usos - eh), do we get another dose of TAG TEAM TURMOIL!!!! for
the belts
Do we get another (useless) Andre the Giant Battle Royale (or do we pretend after last year that that never happened and let it quietly fade away into
obscurity).
[Edited on 2-3-2016 by williamssl]
Don't Mess With Texas
|
|
|
nOOb
The Man 
Posts 6700
Registered 5-24-2004 Member Is Offline Mood: Hot Dog!
|
| posted on 2-3-2016 at 08:09 PM |
|
|
I feel like "MitB at Wrestlemania" is the new "Shelton and Carlito are in town for the Rumble": it's always thrown out there and it never
happens. I imagine that WWE likes saving it for its own event midway through the year and that may not change ever. But Tag Team Turmoil is an easy
sale and so is multi-person IC Title ladder match. And the Andre Battle Royal should just go away. It only seems to exist to show who WWE
won't be pushing this year.
It also feels like I've cancelled the Network twice now before Mania because WWE isn't making a compelling "Road To". Though the NXT
special looks to blow it away so there's a reason not to.
"The Seahawks are cool. Me and Tubby here hung out with them once at a Bruno Mars concert."-Jay and Silent Bob representing the Broncos on FOX NFL
Sunday.
|
|
|
williamssl
Steers and Queers
Posts 7137
Registered 1-11-2004 Location Hippieville Member Is Offline Mood: Fuck USC
|
| posted on 2-3-2016 at 10:48 PM |
|
|
Sorry - I get all the "shiny object hanging above the ring requiring ladder to get it and winner gets the shiny " matches and where they happen
confused. IC belt. Briefcase. Undisputibed championship.
Yes - one of those matches at WM and if it's IC then that makes sense. (insert annual-or-some-other-frequency rumor about US/IC consolidation
here).
Don't Mess With Texas
|
|
|
Paddlefoot
Rocco Rock of Jabroni
Posts 5794
Registered 1-19-2008 Location Scarsguard Member Is OnlineMood: Finally Deleted
|
| posted on 2-3-2016 at 11:25 PM |
|
|
Depending on his recovery, and that he said the dirtsheets were full of shit about him needing a second surgery on his neck after his shoulder healed,
I'm guessing that Orton will be the one to face Taker. Pretty sure that the Taker/Sting match will never happen ever. Batista's openly
said he doesn't want to come back yet and is too busy with the filming of the second GOTG movie now underway. Rock's insurance
issues/filming schedule rules him out. Lesnar has the Wyatts, including Strowman, to deal with. Reigns has Hunter and I still think that Ambrose is
going to be involved in that feud for a while longer. Sheamus is still injured as of today. Cena's not coming back early from his injury this
time around. Maybe there's an outside chance of someone like Owens going up against Taker but it's a pretty small chance. Most likely
Owens is going to be in the mix with Ziggler/AJ and/or Zayn/Joe depending if they want to get them on the main roster, plus the other guys from the
Bullet Club as well could get mixed up in that scene too if they get to the main roster instead of going to NXT first. This WM could be the one-off
they allegedly want to sign Goldberg for. But no one's really shit all over a Taker match at WM for a long, long time though, and they
wouldn't want that kind of fan reaction to happen at all, so the great greedy snapping turtle (with his unique ability to alienate entire
audiences) is highly unlikely too. Same with Kane because no one wants to see the Bros of Destruction fighting each other ever again. So it's
Orton or something completely surprising for Taker this time around.
You know, everyone says it's not supposed to make sense, like that's the whole point, dude. And I'm just saying, you know,
that's like an excuse for lazy storytelling. Just don't sell me shite and tell me it's gold, all right? I might be stoned, but
I'm not high. You know what I mean?
- Cassidy from Preacher, commenting on The Big Lebowski and/or professional wrestling
|
|
|
janerd75
The Rowdy One 
Posts 2612
Registered 1-28-2013 Location Enward Central Member Is Offline Mood: Bauce
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 01:36 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Paddlefoot
Depending on his recovery, and that he said the dirtsheets were full of shit about him needing a second surgery on his neck after his shoulder healed,
I'm guessing that Orton will be the one to face Taker.
And somewhere at an undisclosed bunker in Florida, a man in an adult Gator onesie is calmly sipping from a Brandy snifter, casually admiring the vast
collection of Titus O'Neal and A.J. Lee posters that adorn his study. He absentmindedly looks down at his laptop, clicks past his Tim Tebow
screen saver to multiple open tabs of OO and begins to read. He finds the above quote and the glass falls from his hand, shattering to pieces on his
orange and blue colored floor. His cat Mr. Steve Spurrier bolts from the room in fear as he senses his master's growing rage. The man closes his
laptop and and clenches his fists, the anger rising like those neat lava island deals in the Pacific that are so cool to watch in high def on, like,
Discovery Channel or some shit...oh, right...
The man begins to tear the fabric of his onesie as he looks over to the stacks and stacks of boxes labelled, "RKO Remotes", all of which an insane
person had carefully removed every button save for the ones marked "Play" and "FF". Out of the endtable drawer next to him he removes a vegetable
peeler, bandages, and a bottle of lube. He wept as he slowly became engorged and tumescent, whispering to himself, "No, no, no, no, not again, you
son of a bitch. Not again".
Fin.
Sorry, went into a fugue state for a second. What did I miss? Oh, right. Who's Taker facing. Well, mah Canegro just gave me the inspirado.
Owens, I think, would be great, but I think he's better served with some combo of Zayn/Ziggler/AJ/Ambrose. I like the Sausage King and am glad
he's supplanting Kane and Big Show as their premiere big guy. Too green, though, and Taker needs a quality operator to help him look good.
So lately with Taker he's added quasi MMA repertoire to his gimmick ever since him and HHH and especially since Lesnar. So what other person on
the roster could possibly fit the badass bill as a legit asskicker? Samoa Joe. Yes, yes, he'll be busy at Takeover. But considering who
he's fighting, you could almost make a case for somehow injecting his Gay Demon Spooky into the mix as well. If it's not Taker's
farewell, then why not call up a couple of the NXT "kids" to play in his sandbox? Hell, are they bold enough to have Taker offer to beat anyone at
WM and then, instead of an Andre Battle Royal, have one guy after the next come down and get chokeslammed...until finally Joe comes out and it. Is.
ON!
It's gonna be the Legend Killer, isn't it? Meh, it fits I guess, and the crowd will just shit overpriced concession taquitos when he hits
an RKO, so.... 
The science is settled: Fuck Everybody
|
|
|
Paddlefoot
Rocco Rock of Jabroni
Posts 5794
Registered 1-19-2008 Location Scarsguard Member Is OnlineMood: Finally Deleted
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 03:42 AM |
|
|
And the internet responds to the Soviet Canuckistani's suggestion thusly,
You should take Jeb's suggestion to heart on how to deal with upset in a better manner. That potato peeler sounds painful. Just pour a cup of
tea, look out the window over the bay (or the crack dealers in your condo's parking lot) as it cools, and sigh wistfully. Melancholia. Us WWE
fans haz it.
You know, everyone says it's not supposed to make sense, like that's the whole point, dude. And I'm just saying, you know,
that's like an excuse for lazy storytelling. Just don't sell me shite and tell me it's gold, all right? I might be stoned, but
I'm not high. You know what I mean?
- Cassidy from Preacher, commenting on The Big Lebowski and/or professional wrestling
|
|
|
janerd75
The Rowdy One
Posts 2612
Registered 1-28-2013 Location Enward Central Member Is Offline Mood: Bauce
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 05:44 AM |
|
|
T'weren't me to whoms I was referring. T'was the other Gayturd on the bOOard. Lurnn too read suttlety stoobid Cannunist!
Outside of Joe, and I am so, so, so sorry Dom, but I wouldn't mind Randell Dorfman vs. Taker at Mania. Legend Killer gimmick, natch. Sweet pop
from an absence-makes-the-heart-grow-fonder perspective. Though I still like my semi-gauntlet match-ish thing-a-ma-bob by having them not announce the
opponent until right before or at Mania to get away from the point-at-WM sign dealie that's standard practice now. It's Taker. He's
a Mania staple now. He'll be fighting someone and fans will show up for that no matter who it is. Except for maybe The Sausage King. But
especially if it's Daniel Bryan. 
quote:
Originally posted by Paddlefoot
Melancholia. Us WWE fans haz it.
I wish. I could use some
Melancholia right now. Von Trier FTW! Also, NSFW,
dummies.
The science is settled: Fuck Everybody
|
|
|
williamssl
Steers and Queers
Posts 7137
Registered 1-11-2004 Location Hippieville Member Is Offline Mood: Fuck USC
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 05:49 AM |
|
|
We got UT Orton doing Legend vs Legend Killer theme at WM 21
They can rematch or whatever. Just don't repeat that as the reason why.
Don't Mess With Texas
|
|
|
Paddlefoot
Rocco Rock of Jabroni
Posts 5794
Registered 1-19-2008 Location Scarsguard Member Is OnlineMood: Finally Deleted
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 05:52 AM |
|
|
Sorry. All SEC fans look the same to me.
[Edited on 2/4/2016 by Paddlefoot]
You know, everyone says it's not supposed to make sense, like that's the whole point, dude. And I'm just saying, you know,
that's like an excuse for lazy storytelling. Just don't sell me shite and tell me it's gold, all right? I might be stoned, but
I'm not high. You know what I mean?
- Cassidy from Preacher, commenting on The Big Lebowski and/or professional wrestling
|
|
|
janerd75
The Rowdy One
Posts 2612
Registered 1-28-2013 Location Enward Central Member Is Offline Mood: Bauce
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 08:28 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by williamssl
We got UT Orton doing Legend vs Legend Killer theme at WM 21
They can rematch or whatever. Just don't repeat that as the reason why.
Yes, but now it's 11 years later. You just refuse to see the good in things, don't you?
Weird thought, but what if, like the past two years in a god  row, they course correct at the last second...and Ambrose wins at Fastlane to meet
HHH at Mania? Reigns is thwarted agayn. No better impetus for The Turn than that. But before that happens Roman faces the Undertaker instead of
Strowman. So with a minor shift in personnel you would get a major change in scenery...
HHH vs. Ambrose (WWE Title)
Undertaker vs. Reigns (With some vague backstory even though it was BikerTaker)
With HHH vs. Ambrose, you get a more classic Heel vs. Face, even though Dean's within shouting distance of the tweener/anti-hero persona.
Regardless, there would be a significantly lower chance of fan revolt considering Dean's overosity. Ambrose wins and the crowd goes home happy,
or at least much happier than the alternative.
With Undertaker vs. Reigns, Roman would be best served getting his turn on by freaking out and decimating Taker...after he takes a Tombstone and a
loss. Taker gets a win on the home turf, but he helps put the kid over at the same time.
Next night on Raw, the Authority can at least continue the mind games and emphasize the Dean win and the Roman loss to further the inevitable split.
quote:
Originally posted by Paddlefoot
Sorry. All SEC fans look the same to me.
Hey, that's racist!  And startlingly accurate! Jebus, that comic's every small town north of Orlando and south of the
Mason-Dixon. 
The science is settled: Fuck Everybody
|
|
|
shashwat mishra
Showstopper
Posts 635
Registered 9-27-2002 Location Bhubaneswar, India Member Is Offline Mood: Nostalgic
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 01:10 PM |
|
|
1) Looking forward to AJ Styles winning the Intercontinental Title from Rusev/Kevin Owens.
2) Undertaker vs Roman Reigns looks good provided Undertaker is winning.
3) It will be very interesting if Cena returns at Wrestlemania and turns heel on Roman Reigns.
4) Maybe Samoa Joe gets on the Wrestlemania card.
Bret Hart - Best Ever, Undertaker - Most Memorable, The Rock - Most Entertaining.
|
|
|
punkerhardcore
American Dream 
Posts 7730
Registered 7-16-2005 Member Is Offline Mood: Lickable
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 07:28 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by janerd75
I like the Sausage King and am glad he's supplanting Kane and Big Show as their premiere big guy.
Ehhhh, I don't see it. The dude has done nothing memorable since his debut. What moves does he even have besides that bearhug/sleeper
finisher? I guess he probably does a clothesline, but I'd have to look it up.
Luke Harper should be the next monster in the WWE. Dude is big, can look scary and can put on great matches.
Poor Undertaker always has to have matches with this big worthless fucks that Vince has a boner for (Giant Gonzalez, Great Khali). But this
isn't 10, 20 years ago where a match with one of this loads wasn't a big deal since Taker was still full time and could move on to a feud
with somebody else. He's only got a handful of matches left, and can't waste one on Strowman. Not only that, Taker can't exactly
be expected to carry someone to a good match anymore.
Now I actually kinda hope this happens, just so we can have one of the all-time worst Mania upper cards.
Is everyone mad here?
Of course they are, and you are too... otherwise, you wouldn't have come here.
|
|
|
nOOb
The Man
Posts 6700
Registered 5-24-2004 Member Is Offline Mood: Hot Dog!
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 10:19 PM |
|
|
I just figure Braun Strowman is going to be used big to get in on that crossover money:
Even though it doesn't start up again until a bit after Wrestlemania...
[Edited on 2-4-2016 by nOOb]
"The Seahawks are cool. Me and Tubby here hung out with them once at a Bruno Mars concert."-Jay and Silent Bob representing the Broncos on FOX NFL
Sunday.
|
|
|
janerd75
The Rowdy One
Posts 2612
Registered 1-28-2013 Location Enward Central Member Is Offline Mood: Bauce
|
| posted on 2-4-2016 at 11:27 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by punkerhardcore
quote:
Originally posted by janerd75
I like the Sausage King and am glad he's supplanting Kane and Big Show as their premiere big guy.
Ehhhh, I don't see it. The dude has done nothing memorable since his debut. What moves does he even have besides that bearhug/sleeper
finisher? I guess he probably does a clothesline, but I'd have to look it up.
Luke Harper should be the next monster in the WWE. Dude is big, can look scary and can put on great matches.
Poor Undertaker always has to have matches with this big worthless fucks that Vince has a boner for (Giant Gonzalez, Great Khali). But this
isn't 10, 20 years ago where a match with one of this loads wasn't a big deal since Taker was still full time and could move on to a feud
with somebody else. He's only got a handful of matches left, and can't waste one on Strowman. Not only that, Taker can't exactly
be expected to carry someone to a good match anymore.
Now I actually kinda hope this happens, just so we can have one of the all-time worst Mania upper cards.
I dunno, for some reason I don't find him as offensive as Gonzalez or Khali, and I'm a bit tired of Kane and Show (but not Henry) as the
go to big guys. And absolutely on Harper because he checks all the boxes of agile for a big guy, menacing, and can talk. But seeing Strowman next to
Show and Kane, to me, is pretty damn impressive. But I agree he is green and shouldn't go anywhere near Taker, considering his dance card for
the past several Manias have included the likes of Shawn, HHH, Punk, and Lesnar. In comparing Braun to those guys, one of those things is most
certainly not like the other. Reigns, however, I think would cure a lot of ills should he face Taker instead.
I'm not sure if someone mentioned this before, but considering the course corrections they've done the past two Manias, I wonder if
it's possible if the Strowman vs. Taker rumors are getting floated by WWE just to gauge social media outcry so they can then get a better sense
of what they should or shouldn't do going forward once they realize the potential fan revolt is getting too big too ignore. In a similar vein, I
worked for a retardedly rich guy with a borderline/narcissistic bi-polar personality (like Vince) before. He would just get absolutely frenzied and
determined to push his way through with his ideas even though the rest of the team knew it would end in disaster. Sure enough, enough failures that he
captained to fruition would pile up that he would eventually go catatonic, chuck down a handful of meds, go away for a while and then that would allow
us to fix what he fucked up in peace. I'm curious to know if that's what HHH has to go through in the buildup to WM with Vince getting
more and more incredulous as to why we're not buying into what he's selling and then peacing the fuck out when he realizes in frustration
all us ingrate primates ain't giving in about certain things. Not necessarily justifying wankery or fans going into business for themselves,
just the general concern that something like HHH/Reigns and Taker/Strowman are not being well received overall.
ETA: Found some Haterate for you to enjoy.
I will dance of the grave of this company before I give you marks what you want.
Regards Shitbirds,
Vincent K. McMahon
[Edited on 2-4-2016 by janerd75]
The science is settled: Fuck Everybody
|
|
|
shashwat mishra
Showstopper
Posts 635
Registered 9-27-2002 Location Bhubaneswar, India Member Is Offline Mood: Nostalgic
|
| posted on 2-5-2016 at 05:38 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by punkerhardcore
Luke Harper should be the next monster in the WWE. Dude is big, can look scary and can put on great matches.
This is true and Luke is pretty underutilized as part of a stable.
Maybe Eric Rowan and that Big Teddy Bear can be new Wyatt Tag Team and Luke can be put into the Intercontinental/U.S Title Mix. He looks like he can
beat up most of the roster quite easily.
Bret Hart - Best Ever, Undertaker - Most Memorable, The Rock - Most Entertaining.
|
|
|
williamssl
Steers and Queers
Posts 7137
Registered 1-11-2004 Location Hippieville Member Is Offline Mood: Fuck USC
|
| posted on 2-6-2016 at 01:06 AM |
|
|
Scott Hall's suggestion to make the main event more main-eventy:
Reigns (w/ Rock in corner) vs. HHH (w/ HBK in corner) with Daniel Bryan as special guest referee.
Don't Mess With Texas
|
|
|
punkerhardcore
American Dream
Posts 7730
Registered 7-16-2005 Member Is Offline Mood: Lickable
|
| posted on 2-6-2016 at 01:15 AM |
|
|
They probably don't want the ref to be a million times more over than the guy who will win the title.
Cole: Reigns did it! He finally overcame the Authority and beat the odds to win the WWE Championship (for the third time in four months)!
JBL: The WWE Universe must have really loved the ref work Bryan did, Maggle! They can't stop chanting for him!
[Edited on 2-6-2016 by punkerhardcore]
Is everyone mad here?
Of course they are, and you are too... otherwise, you wouldn't have come here.
|
|
|
Dominator
Dominated by my love for Randy Orton
Posts 1614
Registered 7-5-2007 Location Florida Member Is Offline Mood: RKOFree Since 4/9/13
|
| posted on 2-6-2016 at 03:16 AM |
|
|
If it's Orton vs. Taker that's fine by me. Orton can't break the streak, it's already broken. And if Taker retires two
people in the same match, winner is us.
I do NOT love RKO, you sarcastic bastards.
"There are no politics in WWE." - Stephanie McMahon
"BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA!!!" - Me
|
|
|
Paddlefoot
Rocco Rock of Jabroni
Posts 5794
Registered 1-19-2008 Location Scarsguard Member Is OnlineMood: Finally Deleted
|
| posted on 2-6-2016 at 04:57 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dominator
If it's Orton vs. Taker that's fine by me. Orton can't break the streak, it's already broken. And if Taker retires two
people in the same match, winner is us.
Creating positivity from a negative scenario, Dom-style? That's not a bad thing.....
This might actually be a POTY candidate. The cynicism and misanthropy and sheer hatred for one insignificant little individual sports entertainment
choad is so off the scale it's really quite breathtaking. 
You know, everyone says it's not supposed to make sense, like that's the whole point, dude. And I'm just saying, you know,
that's like an excuse for lazy storytelling. Just don't sell me shite and tell me it's gold, all right? I might be stoned, but
I'm not high. You know what I mean?
- Cassidy from Preacher, commenting on The Big Lebowski and/or professional wrestling
|
|
|
Flash
The Rowdy One
Posts 2856
Registered 4-22-2005 Location Brantford, Ontario Member Is Offline Mood:
|
| posted on 2-6-2016 at 05:14 AM |
|
|
The newest Stroman related rumour is that he's actually better in the ring than he looks, and that Vince and the PTB have told him to not really
do stuff in the ring so that once he's pushed he'll look better.....
Yeah.... that's a real rumour.
The WWE's new talent philosophy: package talent like crap, then have them do stuff so people like them! It's worked for Rei..... er, never
mind.
|
|
|
the goon
Sister Act
Posts 5781
Registered 3-13-2004 Location Charlotte, NC Member Is Offline Mood:
|
| posted on 2-6-2016 at 07:54 AM |
|
|
I still hate that the WWE has a PPV between the Royal Rumble and WrestleMania. And I get that Fastlane (or whatever PPV has been done in years past
between the Rumble and Mania) can be used to further along storylines, and that's fine, but it just seems like a stutter-step on the proverbial
Road to WrestleMania. I'd prefer the WrestleMania feuds to start simmering the night after the Rumble, without having to think "oh shit, we
still have another PPV to go before the buildup to WrestleMania really begins."
As for this year's show, I dunno...it just feels kind of weird with all of the injuries and outside of Triple H/Reigns and Lesnar/Bray, we have
zero idea what anyone else is going to be involved in. Though I do have a feeling that like last year, we're going to see guys like AJ, Ambrose,
Owens, Ziggler, Neville, etc all lumped together in some kind of ladder match.
Nash is only a few inches bigger than JBL and depending on how stiff he gets Punk should be able to take it. -JB King, meant in a totally non-sexual
way
|
|
|
Dominator
Dominated by my love for Randy Orton
Posts 1614
Registered 7-5-2007 Location Florida Member Is Offline Mood: RKOFree Since 4/9/13
|
| posted on 2-6-2016 at 08:15 AM |
|
|
I solved this problem in April.
http://www.oowrestling.com/OOForums/viewthread.php?tid=30337
I do NOT love RKO, you sarcastic bastards.
"There are no politics in WWE." - Stephanie McMahon
"BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA!!!" - Me
|
|
|
williamssl
Steers and Queers
Posts 7137
Registered 1-11-2004 Location Hippieville Member Is Offline Mood: Fuck USC
|
| posted on 2-11-2016 at 06:56 PM |
|
|
Rumor, but WM32 related, so putting it here:
quote:
Braun Strowman vs. Undertaker is now completely off the table for WrestleMania because the new plan is for Strowman to win the Andre the Giant
Memorial Battle Royal. That would lead right on into the previously rumored big match with Brock Lesnar at SummerSlam.
Regardless of whether the Strowman/UT rumor was true or not, this seemingly makes it all go away and that is a good thing.
However, this is our first sign that the AtGMBR may in fact be continuing on this year's card, which I'm not sure I'm happy
about....but this would be a far more effective use of Strowman and accomplishing whatever hard-on based objectives they have for him and WM's
role in getting said hard-on plan in motion.
Don't Mess With Texas
|
|
|
punkerhardcore
American Dream
Posts 7730
Registered 7-16-2005 Member Is Offline Mood: Lickable
|
| posted on 2-11-2016 at 09:17 PM |
|
|
The Andre Battle Royal would be better if they just made a few tweaks to it:
1. Have it two months earlier.
2. Have the prize be a championship match.
[Edited on 2-11-2016 by punkerhardcore]
Is everyone mad here?
Of course they are, and you are too... otherwise, you wouldn't have come here.
|
|
|
janerd75
The Rowdy One
Posts 2612
Registered 1-28-2013 Location Enward Central Member Is Offline Mood: Bauce
|
| posted on 2-11-2016 at 11:11 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by punkerhardcore
The Andre Battle Royal would be better if they just made a few tweaks to it:
1. Have it two months earlier.
2. Have the prize be a championship match.
Can it be called the Aristocratic Altercation or Magnate Melee? If only the WWE had a similar pre-established long-standing PPV that, when booked
correctly, could solve all the issues you bring up.  
The science is settled: Fuck Everybody
|
|
|
