Powered by LiquidWeb NEW SEARCH FEATURE! IT WORKS!
Search all of OO for news, columnists, and articles about your favorites!

 

News  -/-  Recaps  -/-  Columns  -/-  Features  -/-  Reference  -/-  Archives  -/-  Interact  -/-  Site Info

 

Donate to Online Onslaught!
CLICK HERE TO HELP KEEP OO ALIVE!
MAIN PAGE
NEWS
     Daily Onslaught
RECAPS
     RAW
     SmackDown!
     PPV
     NWA-TNA
     Heat
     Velocity
     Other 
COLUMNS
     Obtuse Angle
     RAW Satire
     The Broad
         Perspective

     Inside the Ropes
     OOld Tyme
         Rasslin' Revue
    
Circa/Dungeon 
     Title Wave
    
Crashing the
         Boards

     Deconstruction
     Smarky Awards
     Big in Japan
     Guest Columnists
     2 Out of 3 Falls
     Devil's Due
     The Ring
     The Little Things
     Timeline
    
SK Rants
    
The Mac Files
     Sq'd Circle Jerk
     TWiFW
FEATURES
     RAW vs. SD!:
         Brand Battle
 
     Cheap Heat 
     Year in Review
     Monday Wars
     Road to WM 

     Interviews
REFERENCE
     Title Histories
     Real Names
     PPV Results
     Smart Glossary
     Birthdays 
ARCHIVES 
INTERACT
     Message Boards
     Live Chat 
SITE INFO
     Contact
     OO History

If you attend a live show, or have any other news for us, just send an e-mail to this address!  We'd also love to hear from you if you've got suggestions or complaints about the site...  let us have it!

 
THE OBTUSE ANGLE  
The Contents of Their Characters 
May 20, 2004

by Jeb Tennyson Lund
OnlineOnslaught.com/CitizenScholar.net

 

By now, a goodly chunk of viewers are busy expressing their outrage — their "total moral outrage" — at Randy Orton's implied racist comments toward Shelton Benjamin. I agree; they were horrible. But my disgust comes not from moral indignation. Instead, I'm appalled at bad storytelling.

Because that's the real issue, here. Some people think that racism is taboo in wrestling, regardless of the circumstance. Others think it's useful when heels need to generate more heat — believing that doing so makes an angle more interesting without implying a WWE stamp of approval on racism. Yet no matter what your opinion on the permissibility of racism in stories, the fact is that it's not the real villain here. Bad writing is. And it can erase or disguise what we know of Randy Orton and Shelton Benjamin.


Poor Storytelling
Even an average storyteller knows that the best of tales is lessened through repetition. A two-hour battle with a hooked marlin might seem like an epic confrontation — your own personal Old Man and the Sea — but it will lose its impact and even become comical if you insist on telling it every time you go fishing with your buddies. After a while, they'll find more entertainment in the fact that you always tell it, rather than think of your struggle with one of nature's more stubborn beasts.

Unfortunately, WWE finds itself in the same position. They told this tale just over a year ago in the main-event picture. Booker T and Triple H's confrontation over the belt and racial issues netted a great deal of attention, and that sticks in fans' memories. Because it happened on a grander scale than this IC battle, it's not easily forgotten. As such, even if Orton's comments become more scandalous or revolting, they will begin to sink amid a kind of "here we go again" attitude. On one hand, that's bad for crowd interest. But it's also bad for our perspective on race. It's a sad day for our humanity when we respond to racism (overt or implied) with diminished outrage and instead a wearied sigh of, "Same old, same old."

Worsening this circumstance is the fact that the exact same theme is being used on Smackdown. Although Bradshaw's hatred of Eddie Guerrero is couched in terms of pro-American anti-immigrant tropes, race is its key underpinning. He certainly doesn't seem to care about skilled German engineers coming to America to work in the tech sector or important infrastructure-related jobs. No, he camps out on the Mexican-American border and scares off the browner peoples of this world.

(Of course, I take great delight in the fact that the Bradshaw character wants to prevent immigrants from employment no American citizen would countenance taking. I also find it funny that quasi-economist John Layfield knows full well that immigrants contribute to the economy by paying sales taxes, purchasing basic services — and thus contributing to others' employment — and keeping prices low. Imagine the grinding economic downturn resulting from mandatory minimum wage and social-security benefits for agricultural workers — thus resulting in fewer work hours and the increase in the cost of a head of lettuce, from 79 cents to two dollars. John Bradshaw Layfield would abhor this, because it would result in an increase in costs and also a restriction on laissez faire economic principles.)

Nonetheless, whether you're bored or annoyed by these racist stories, they are abundant and fast losing their effect. Orton race-baiting Benjamin is now a thrice-told tale. It added little to no interest in the already milquetoast Guerrero/Bradshaw confrontation. Its ubiquity robs it of electricity. If it did little good on Smackdown, how much good can it do on another show, just days later?


Character Killing, and Overkill
Another shame about the race issue is that, while it may add another dimension to a story, it robs characters of their own dimensions. Prior to last year's WrestleMania, Booker T had a great background. He was a five-time champion looking to prove himself in a different company. He had the sentimentality and the gravitas from a good friend (Goldust) parting ways with him — not out of animosity, but out of brotherhood. Goldust stopped wrestling with Booker because he cared for him: he felt their partnership kept Booker from realizing his full potential.

It was a heart-warming story. Given the quirkiness and dimensions of their partnership, it seemed reasonable without being cloying or maudlin. Today, the idea of Booker becoming the man he could be, while seeking vengeance for his friend's injuries by defeating his attacker, is diminished by the unnecessary and overriding racial issue. As racism is referenced again and again, the story of honor and friendship recedes all too sadly into the background.

Something similar could happen to Shelton Benjamin. At this point, he isn't the most compelling character. But he already has three things working for him. One is his legacy as a good worker in The World's Greatest Tag Team. A second is his record of defeating Triple H twice, through youthful exuberance, talent, agility and determination. A third is his obvious in-ring humor and attitude. Like Benoit, he stumbles when telling his story on the mic. In the ring with Triple H and Ric Flair, however, his character was unmistakable: the taunts, the smirks, the imitation and repetition of moves... the whole presence that seemed to say, "I will take you to your limit, Old Man; but, as for me, I know none yet."

Benjamin is a good young wrestler, hungry for success. At the moment, he is still finding his character. What that character is, now, is a youth unfamiliar with physical limitation, determined to win more, learn more, add more and be more. Take the focus away from that, and you take away all the character and definition for which he's worked.

As with Booker T, that can happen. Should Orton's race-baiting increase or grow increasingly protracted over the next few weeks, Benjamin as a young wrestler will lose definition, while "Benjamin: Black Man" looms in the foreground. His individuality is subsumed by a negative social force (racism) and the counter-force of him defending or validating his race, instead of himself. When, then, does Benjamin just become a Great Wrestler? When does his motivation pertain to him and his character, not an overarching and smothering sense of race? When is he a representative of Himself and not of blacks or minorities in general? When is he himself?

The fact is that Benjamin is not alone in being marginalized as an individual because of a racial story. Orton is a self-important bastard with a limited ring-history. His arrogance is still only moderately deserved. While proclaiming an eternal legacy, we also know that his actions and record do not fully support said claim. What was a perfectly serviceable conflict between a hubristic semi-legitimate blowhard and an eager semi-legitimate up-and-comer now potentially represents a racial clash that diverts attention from the two wrestlers in it. Though I am no fan of Orton, I'm less a fan of a wrestler getting stripped of his persona.

Orton actually faces a potential double misfortune. Unluckily, his character has never received much depth. He debuted as a vanilla babyface, had the simplistic RNN Updates, became a kind of vanilla heel, got injured, then returned as a Legend Killer. But that identity has been, and is, linked more to the strengths of those he fights. Orton kills legends, but without those legends, he has little to work with. After all, how concerned would we be if he hadn't defeated Michaels and Foley and had instead vanquished Bob Holly and Test?

In a way, Orton's Legend Killer persona is also only as strong as the legends he hangs around with. (It's telling that he's the only member of Evolution without his own music. Either Evolution is him, and the name refers to a process he will go through; or the music signifies that he is least individual of the people in the group.) When one half of his identity is tied to the iconic status of those he confronts, the other half is tied to those he spends time with. It is both a boon and a curse.

It’s a curse because, should he tread down a racial path with Benjamin, he's walking in the footsteps of Triple H. He follows the actions of his compatriots, who are also his guides. Evolution is just that: a progression through the generations of wrestling, with Batista uncomfortably and awkwardly lumped in. Flair is the original, with the others becoming avatars of Flair. Flair is The Man. Triple H is the New Man, and Orton is the next Triple H — or, the "New New Man."

That this group spends most of its time in gurgling imitative congratulation is trying enough. Flair praises Triple H for being Flair-esque, while praising Orton for being H- and Flair-esque, while praising himself, while receiving praise for being himself, while hearing praise for others being like or near him. It is a redundancy wrapped within a photocopy, wrapped within a reproduction.

Orton suffers the pleasure and the pain of being a copy of a copy, in a way. So far, it's worked for him and garnered a decent audience response. But he has done so with the Legend Killer gimmick, an agenda different from Flair or Triple H's. Imitation hindered nothing, because he imitated in terms of character, not specific action. In a racially oriented program with Benjamin, Orton becomes an obvious copy. Race dominating the conflict can obfuscate Benjamin's character, as well as Orton's. But Orton confronts the other self-annihilating scenario: he evaporates in the face of not only race, but Triple H, a man who already did the exact same thing. In this way, the racial issue marginalizes Benjamin and Orton, while giving Orton the opportunity to be doubly irrelevant, by replaying a theme we have seen and disdained before. Benjamin might be sidelined by a racial issue, but Orton becomes the understudy in a role we already wanted to forget.


Mixed Messages
Perhaps the worst aspect of this potential racial storyline is the fact that one doesn't know what to think of it. The wise souls of WWE hold it up as a troubling factor in one sense, then use it as a crutch in another. How can we take seriously any WWE racial issue when it can be either a dire crisis or a happy gimmick?

In one instance, racial issues are supposed to be fascinating. Hirohito is coming! Let us never mind the fact that Hirohito was the Emperor (and also voluntarily told his nation that he was not a god). Let us never mind that all of "Hirohito's" video was historical footage related to the martial Japanese actions of 1932-1945, that were the product of Tojo's junta and the captive aspect of the Japanese crown, in the face of military pressure, public opinion and international embargoes. No, forget that. Japs are bad! Ric Flair already beat us to that conclusion with an unfortunate ad-lib weeks ago.

Racial issues are also fun, because we can make someone else interesting while keeping them one-dimensional! We can orientalize in the truest sense of the word, by having all the Asian peoples be masters of martial arts, possessed of blinding-spit glands and totally unfamiliar with English. They can be bad, because they don't talk, and they hurt people. Then they can be good, because they don't talk, and they hurt different people. We can give them identity by telling everyone how to think of them. God knows those savages can't be understood on their own.

The greatest claim to diversity that the WWE has is that it gives us mixed messages with mixed results.

Consider the character of Eddie Guerrero. He is currently a champion, and a champion of the people. Yet not too long ago, he was the bad guy. He was bad because — let's face it — he was "Mexican." Sure, he was a cheating heel, but the way WWE modified that role is most telling. They made it as ethnic and "un-American" as possible.

Pay no mind to the fact that Eddie was born and raised in the United States. No, he bore the taint of "Mexico." He lied and cheated and stole, like every shiftless dirty Mexican. Heels do that all the time, without a modifying racial identity. Eddie was a heel, but he was more so because he was a Latino heel. He stole, and the hype surrounding his stealing things capitalized on the erroneous notion that Mexicans come here and steal things and earn nothing. And he used Spanish — the bastard! — when speaking. How were people (remember, "people" are "white Americans") supposed to understand him? He was as orientalized as possible, without giving him "mist glands" in the throat.

Worse, in case he wasn't Mexican enough for the audience, someone made sure he drove to the ring in an El Camino with rims and hydraulics on a couple of occasions. The subtlety was masterfully nonexistent. El Caminos, rims, lowriders… they did everything short of giving him a lawnmower, saying that he was your gardener and telling you that he stole cash from the second-drawer of your dresser. Now we consider these stereotypical aspects to be a celebration of Eddie. We love what he drives to the ring. We love his impromptu celebrations in Spanish. We love that he cheats to win and grins while doing so. We forget that we were supposed to hate all of this and hate him for it — and that these accoutrements were part and parcel of a sort of loathsome stereotyping.

We forget that Tajiri was supposed to evil, then a face, then evil, then a face, then God knows what. We forget that we were supposed to loathe him for his mistreatment of Torrie Wilson — the nerve of that Jap, to not only sleep with our tall pretty blonde women, but also not feel lucky that he got to sleep with our tall pretty blonde women. We forget about that, because now he's supposedly nice again, though I defy anyone to tell me why. No one needs to give character to the foreigners, because foreign people do foreign things, because they're foreign. They are what they are, because they are "them."

Into this admixture, we now potentially have Orton and Benjamin. We are supposed to care. I wonder why we should, and I fear that we won't. In their case, race shouldn't have been an important, motivating and decisive issue, but if WWE insists upon making this a central issue, I would wish they made it a serious one. Yet, in other cases, on the other show or in another vignette, race won't be treated seriously. (It will be some happy crutch, or the set-up line for those Jerry Lawler jokes that you and I always write down so we can later throw the paper in the fire and spit on the ground.) WWE gives us so many mixed signals that it's hard to tell when to be offended or excited. Stereotypes are hyped, clung to, and abandoned. How can Orton v. Benjamin (or even Triple H v. Booker) mean anything when the current Smackdown champion is a fan-favorite in spite of being saddled with a once — and potentially still — ethnically offensive identity?

This angle isn't a case of bad storytelling because it's racist: it's bad storytelling because it emerges from an institution steeped in a moral and ethical fog. While race is a positive identifying factor for characters in one instance, it can be a negative factor in others. WWE plays the race card so often and for so many different reasons that indignation becomes weak or nonexistent. On one hand, you may not care because you've seen it before. But on the other, you may not care because you simply don't know if you should.


Two Men, No Direction
In the case of this angle, you shouldn't care about race at all. This is not to say that racism is not appalling, just that it's completely unnecessary here. If, like me, you hate racism in any form, this may be hard to see. After all, how could any man or company find comfort in exploiting one of the most hateful aspects of human societies for the sake of a paltry ratings point or buyrate?

That sort of ambition verges on evil, to my way of thinking. What disgusts me about this angle, however, is that implied or overt evil was wheeled out for the sake of sparking interest in something that was itself already interesting. I want to see Benjamin throttle Orton. I’m incredibly curious how two still-green guys handle themselves in the ring — when Orton has no veteran wrestler as a crutch, when Benjamin will need to adapt and anticipate someone who is occasionally baffled (and baffling) in the ring. These two have the potential to elevate themselves in a vastly more startling and impressive manner than in their last pay-per-view bouts, because this time it will be a clash of equals.

One racist implication can sabotage all of that. This story never needed race. If anything, race should be dreaded.

It's a story we saw over a year ago; it's a story we saw last week; it's a story that minimizes Shelton Benjamin by making him a black man first and a wrestler later, and it's a story that can consume and subsume his and Orton's characters. It's a story one of Orton's mentors was involved in, and following it makes Orton no more than a copycat. Worse, it's a story told in an atmosphere that celebrates and condemns these issues week after week and moment-to-moment, depending on expediency. Its value as a socially motivating factor within the WWE is extremely doubtful. Its value for the men involved in this match is extremely small.

Let us hope WWE has a spate of intermittent wisdom and doesn't replay those comments in a highlight package. Let's ignore it and let it go away. In short, let us hope WWE foregoes the trappings of a simple racial story in favor of two men, both with ability and ambition, who can succeed or fail based on their abilities and characters alone.
 
 

E-MAIL JEB LUND
BROWSE JEB'S ARCHIVE

Jeb Tennyson Lund is the Pope of Online Onslaught. If you want to read his sadly less wrestling-oriented columns, go to www.citizenscholar.net.


 
RAW SATIRE: Nunzio, the Female Body Inspector
 
RAW RECAP: R-Truth is One Angry Black Man
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: The Terrorists Win
 
RAW SATIRE: Wrestling's Most Wanted
 
RAW RECAP: T-Minus 48 Weeks, and Counting
 
PPV RECAP: WWE Extreme Rules 2011
 
OOTRR: WWE Unforgiven 2004 Re-Revued
 
RAW SATIRE: WHAMMY'D~!
 
NEWSFLASH: 2011 WWE Draft Results
 
RAW RECAP: Now You See Him, Now You Still See Him
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Edge's Busy Retirement
 
RAW SATIRE: England is Flavor Country
 
RAW RECAP: Changing Plans
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Bittersweet Victory
 
RAW SATIRE: Who is Sin Cara?
 
RAW RECAP: Other Stuff Happened, Too
 
NEWSFLASH: Edge Retires
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Third Time's the Charm
 
RAW SATIRE: Think of the Children!
 
RAW RECAP: Cena and Rock Ask You to Save the Date
 
PPV RECAP: WWE WrestleMania 27
 
ONLINE ONSLAUGHT: A Throwback WrestleMania?
 
PYRO'S PPV CORNER: WrestleMania 27
 
RAW SATIRE: Big Red Tromboner
 
RAW RECAP: Finally...
 
RAW SATIRE: Thrown Under the Bus
 
NXT RECAP: Like a Cow Chewing its Own Cud...
 
RAW RECAP: Sweet Sweet Vengeance
 
RAW SATIRE: Jersey Wisdom?
 
NXT RECAP: The Case for William Regal
 
RAW RECAP: Miz = Winning
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Who Won NXT, Again?
 
RAW SATIRE: G-Rilla is Here!
  
NXT RECAP: Is This Really Necessary?
 
RAW RECAP: The Soul Crushing Finale
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Christian to the Rescue (Again)
 
RAW SATIRE: Miz's Addition by Subtraction Theatre
 
NXT RECAP: Johnny Curtis?!? Really?!?
 
RAW RECAP: Phoning it In
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Hasta la Vista, Vickie
 
RAW SATIRE: Scandal in the Tag Ranks
 
NXT RECAP: What the What?!?
 
RAW RECAP: Silence is Golden
 
OO: What I'll Remember About Chris Benoit
 
NEWS CENTRAL: All Updates About Benoit Tragedy

 

 

 


All contents are Copyright 1995-2011 by OOWrestling.com.  All rights reserved.
This website is not affiliated with WWE or any other professional wrestling organization.  Privacy Statement.