Wrestling News, Analysis and Commentary

 

News  -/-  Recaps  -/-  Columns  -/-  Features  -/-  Reference  -/-  Archives  -/-  Interact  -/-  Site Info

 

Donate to Online Onslaught!
CLICK HERE TO HELP KEEP OO ALIVE!
MAIN PAGE
NEWS
     Daily Onslaught
RECAPS
     RAW
     SmackDown!
     PPV
     NWA-TNA
     Heat
     Velocity
     Other 
COLUMNS
     Obtuse Angle
     RAW Satire
     The Broad
         Perspective

     Inside the Ropes
     OOld Tyme
         Rasslin' Revue
    
Circa/Dungeon 
     Title Wave
    
Crashing the
         Boards

     Deconstruction
     Smarky Awards
     Big in Japan
     Guest Columnists
     2 Out of 3 Falls
     Devil's Due
     The Ring
     The Little Things
     Timeline
    
SK Rants
    
The Mac Files
     Sq'd Circle Jerk
     TWiFW
FEATURES
     RAW vs. SD!:
         Brand Battle
 
     Cheap Heat 
     Year in Review
     Monday Wars
     Road to WM 

     Interviews
REFERENCE
     Title Histories
     Real Names
     PPV Results
     Smart Glossary
     Birthdays 
ARCHIVES 
INTERACT
     Message Boards
     Live Chat 
SITE INFO
     Contact
     OO History

If you attend a live show, or have any other news for us, just send an e-mail to this address!  We'd also love to hear from you if you've got suggestions or complaints about the site...  let us have it!

 
CRASHING THE BOARDS: SPOTLIGHT
Point/Counterpoint:  Staying Hard(core)
Longer... Is it Worth It?
June 5, 2003

 

The following is a no disqualification, falls count anywhere match scheduled for one fall. This week's topic "Hardcore matches". Introducing first, from Charles Town, WV, weighing in at far more than he should... Eoghann Irving! 

Oh, Look.  A Chair.  *YAWN*
by Eoghann Irving 

Hardcore stipulations do not add anything significant to a match. There, I've said it, and I can already hear the howls of protest from ECW fans and other groups. I am going to stand by my statement though. I will grant you that in a literal sense hardcore stipulations add things to a match; chairs, tables and ladders most often. However, in terms of adding to the emotional impact of a match or getting the audience more involved, they do not add anything.
 
There are a number of reasons why that is the case. Not least is the fact that over the last few years there has been an increasing use of foreign objects in regular non-hardcore matches. After a certain point, chairshots or even hammer blows just don't look that impressive anymore. The audience becomes immune to whatever shock value they once had.
 
Another related reason is that hardcore matches became extremely common in the WWE for a while. Having a hardcore title was perhaps a huge mistake, as it turned hardcore matches from a rare and impressive spectacle into a weekly occurrence. It is hard to give them the same emotional weight when you know there will be another one next week.
 
But there is a third reason too. If the wrestlers are doing their job properly, they ought to be able to get the crowd in to the match without resorting to stunts. And that's what hardcore is: it is a stunt. It is a way of getting people's attention. Good psychology and good storytelling can do that more effectively than any stunt and without the danger of burning out your audience.
 
A perfect example would be the recent match between Ric Flair and HHH on RAW. That was a simple, even slow match that was almost entirely clean (barring a brief appearance by the title belt). The match had been built up over the course of the show using the backstory of the two men's recent relationship. Would that match have magically become better if it had been a Hell in a Cell match? I don't think so; the compelling factor was seeing Flair struggling to overcome the odds, trying to pull it out one more time.
 
Would the audience have been more into it if blood was dripping down Flair's face? Possible, but I doubt it. Blood is not exactly a rarity in wrestling, and the main interest in the match was that hope in many of us that Flair just might be able to do it, despite all logic.
 
Now, to be fair, hardcore matches do have a couple of things going for them. They do open up a number of additional possibilities for how the match will progress. That variety can help to stop everything looking monotonously similar. It is also true that if done correctly, the threat of an apparently serious injury can drag the audience into a match.
 
Except there never is the threat of an apparently serious injury. Except for the unfortunate instances where something genuinely goes wrong (another entirely unrelated argument against hardcore matches) none of the injuries sustained in a hardcore match seem to last beyond the end of the night.
 
If the selling point of a match is the carnage that it involves and how it can "take years off your wrestling career," then things are going to fall very flat if the wrestler who got hit by a flaming two-by-four covered in barbed wire and then slammed through three layers of tables appears on the following night's show.
 
The end result of all these factors — over-use, being commonplace, lack of follow through and replacing good storytelling with stunts — is that hardcore matches are no longer significant selling points and don't automatically make a match better than it would be otherwise.
Once again I will call on RAW for an example of what I am talking about. The Nash/HHH brawl a few weeks back shows almost all of the problems that I have been talking about. The two wrestlers actually had a solid backstory in place to draw upon, but this "match" totally failed to do so. What we were given was two men exchanging blows with each other. In some cases, quite impressive blows, but nothing more than that.
 
While our sympathies ought to have been with Nash, his actions in the brawl did nothing to encourage that. In fact he behaved every bit as badly as HHH, the supposed heel. This brawl incorporated hardcore elements, not least of which was a substantial amount of blood courtesy of HHH (a man never scared to shed some blood if called to), yet those moves caused no reaction for the simple reason that neither man significantly sold the level of injury that they were apparently taking.
 
How are you supposed to care about the seriousness of an injury which does no more than make a man reel briefly then go back to hitting the other guy like he'd just paused for breath?
 
Nor was there any significant storytelling element in the brawl. Sure they moved from the ring through the back and eventually HHH stole a car, but there was no evidence of one person dominating and the other fighting back or any other of the basic match structures which generally add to the audience's emotional response.
 
The hardcore elements of the "match" really added nothing to the entire proceeding, and that is the heart of my argument. Whether it's hardcore rules, falls count anywhere, paddle on a pole or anything else. They are just frills; they're not what makes the match a success.

…and in this corner, trained in the art of debate at the Brown Jug, Tony "markout" Kowalski!

Give it to Me Hardcore, Baby!
by Tony Kowalski 

Professional wrestling exists in a world where suspension of disbelief is a necessity. In that world, we are to believe that an atomic drop is actually a move that causes a person even the most minor discomfort (this is a regular atomic drop, not the inverted "nut-buster" version that I could almost buy into). We know it's fake, and we accept it. But we appreciate it more when we are called upon to suspend out disbelief less. Thus we pop louder for high spots like frog splashes and shooting star presses than we do for drop toe-holds and armbars.
 
The hardcore style represents the ultimate lack of suspended disbelief.  It's a lot easier for me to believe in the supposed pain caused by a chair shot than the supposed pain caused by an elbow drop. It's just common sense that most people can do more damage to other people with foreign objects than they can with their own bodies.
 
Now, I'm willing to concede that at the end of the reign of the now-defunct Hardcore Title it got a little ridiculous. Seeing a guy come down the aisle with a shopping cart filled with garbage cans and Singapore Canes is lame, and I can only suspend my disbelief so much to explain why the WWE seems to keep street signs beneath the ring. But when done correctly, the hardcore style is an amazing tool to put over wrestlers and their feuds, and its value should not be overlooked.
 
Like any other type of match, a certain degree of psychology is required to do a hardcore match correctly. To ignore this psychology shatters the suspension of disbelief. Thus, we put our head in our hands when we see a wrestler ignore his opponent for an extended period of time, in order to get out of the ring and throw chairs, trash cans, fire extinguishers into the ring. Even more ridiculous is the idea that we have to believe that wrestler to be such an idiot that he doesn't realize that he's going to get clubbed with a cafeteria tray when he gets back in the ring. 
 
Yet when these elements are phased into the match properly, the result is much more satisfying. Wrestler A is stalking Wrestler B outside of the ring when B is able to grab a chair and whack A with it, thus changing the momentum of the match. B then beats A up the ramp into the staging area, where A reverses an attempt to sling him into a wall, and is then able to suplex B through a table. The master of this psychology, and the wrestler whom I hold to be the greatest Hardcore Champ of all time, was Road Dogg. He wrestled hardcore matches weekly for a few months, and worked items in to his match that were nearby, whether it was delivering a pile driver through a pallet behind the arena to landing an elbow/chair on someone off the apron, he made it believable without making it ridiculous. Without hardcore, the guy wouldn't know an arm bar from a strip bar, but he got over huge on the hardcore style, because of the psychology involved in his matches.
 
Another place where hardcore wrestling made careers was the tag division circa 2000. The Hardys, Edge and Christian, and the Dudleys spent more than a year trying to kill each other with assorted combinations of tables, ladders and chairs. The Hardys got over on the basis of their high-flying antics, and the Dudleys got over due to their proclivity for putting people through tables (powerbomb Mae Young again PUH-LEEZE!). When we saw Jeff Hardy willing to jump off a ladder to Swanton Bomb Bubba Ray Dudley through a table so that he and Matt might win the tag titles, it added some serious luster to what had been a sorely lacking division for the past few years. These three teams' hardcore stylings proclaimed to the world, "We want to be the best, and we are willing to kill ourselves and each other in order to do it." Those TLC matches made those teams, and made the tag division a respectable commodity once again.
 
Now to say that HHH and Ric Flair didn't need hardcore style to add to their match isn't fair. No shit they didn't: that's HHH versus Ric Flair, for Christ's sake! Not only are they masters in the ring, but they also didn't have any reason to resort to hardcore wrestling. Think instead about "Mankind" Mick Foley against the Rock for the belt at the 1999 Royal Rumble. Those two had been having a brutal blood feud over the past few months, leading to this "I Quit" match. Here it had been built up that they hated each other so much that they genuinely wanted to injure each other. Let's face it... having the Rock deliver an extra People's Elbow wouldn't get across the animosity that these two had for each other.  Enter the hardcore style. Chair shot after sickening chair shot played out the hatred between the two, making it very possible for the audience to believe in it, making it seem much more "real."
 
HHH and Kevin Nash's little backstage soiree was supposed to take us along this same line of thinking. They hated each other so much that they wanted to hurt each other. One little problem here: not more than a month had passed since they had hugged in the ring. To develop the kind of hatred that would lead to such desire to cause personal injury takes longer than a month. So if the segment fell a little flat, equal fault could lie with the story, if not the style. It simply didn't have the build up to explain the actions that were taking place.
 
What it boils down to is believability. Anything that makes professional wrestling more believable is a good thing. Hardcore wrestling can make the matches more believable. It can articulately demonstrate the hatred that exists between any parties involved in some conflict, or the desire to come out on top in that conflict. Like anything else in wrestling or life in general, it needs to be used correctly and with moderation. But it definitely has a place in the wrestling world, and an important one at that.

WHO WON THE BATTLE, EOGHANN OR TONY?  PICK THE WINNER OF OUR LATEST ROUND:  CLICK HERE TO VOTE!
  Shop at Amazon.com


 
RAW SATIRE: Nunzio, the Female Body Inspector
 
RAW RECAP: R-Truth is One Angry Black Man
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: The Terrorists Win
 
RAW SATIRE: Wrestling's Most Wanted
 
RAW RECAP: T-Minus 48 Weeks, and Counting
 
PPV RECAP: WWE Extreme Rules 2011
 
OOTRR: WWE Unforgiven 2004 Re-Revued
 
RAW SATIRE: WHAMMY'D~!
 
NEWSFLASH: 2011 WWE Draft Results
 
RAW RECAP: Now You See Him, Now You Still See Him
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Edge's Busy Retirement
 
RAW SATIRE: England is Flavor Country
 
RAW RECAP: Changing Plans
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Bittersweet Victory
 
RAW SATIRE: Who is Sin Cara?
 
RAW RECAP: Other Stuff Happened, Too
 
NEWSFLASH: Edge Retires
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Third Time's the Charm
 
RAW SATIRE: Think of the Children!
 
RAW RECAP: Cena and Rock Ask You to Save the Date
 
PPV RECAP: WWE WrestleMania 27
 
ONLINE ONSLAUGHT: A Throwback WrestleMania?
 
PYRO'S PPV CORNER: WrestleMania 27
 
RAW SATIRE: Big Red Tromboner
 
RAW RECAP: Finally...
 
RAW SATIRE: Thrown Under the Bus
 
NXT RECAP: Like a Cow Chewing its Own Cud...
 
RAW RECAP: Sweet Sweet Vengeance
 
RAW SATIRE: Jersey Wisdom?
 
NXT RECAP: The Case for William Regal
 
RAW RECAP: Miz = Winning
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Who Won NXT, Again?
 
RAW SATIRE: G-Rilla is Here!
  
NXT RECAP: Is This Really Necessary?
 
RAW RECAP: The Soul Crushing Finale
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Christian to the Rescue (Again)
 
RAW SATIRE: Miz's Addition by Subtraction Theatre
 
NXT RECAP: Johnny Curtis?!? Really?!?
 
RAW RECAP: Phoning it In
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Hasta la Vista, Vickie
 
RAW SATIRE: Scandal in the Tag Ranks
 
NXT RECAP: What the What?!?
 
RAW RECAP: Silence is Golden
 
OO: What I'll Remember About Chris Benoit
 
NEWS CENTRAL: All Updates About Benoit Tragedy

 

 

 


All contents are Copyright 1995-2011 by OOWrestling.com.  All rights reserved.
This website is not affiliated with WWE or any other professional wrestling organization.  Privacy Statement.