The Online Onslaught Forums


By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows. Thanks!

Last active: Never Not logged in [Login ]

Printable Version |
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Weekly Ratings / Battle of the Brands
williamssl
Steers and Queers






Posts 7903
Registered 1-11-2004
Location Hippieville
Member Is Offline

Mood: Fuck USC

posted on 2-4-2013 at 02:48 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
Weekly Ratings / Battle of the Brands

This hasn't really happened in like ever. Good concept but hasn't caught on with any consistency.

I am game with trying a reboot but this is kinda an "all/most or nothing" thing re participation.

I only watch Raw with any consistency so can't rate the other shows.


If we don't....Rick.....you ok with zapping the references in the show threads?





Don't Mess With Texas

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Matte
"Family Man"






Posts 10064
Registered 12-16-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: #BROKEN

posted on 2-7-2013 at 11:53 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
0/5





"I'm a professional. I know exactly what I'm doing." - Jeff Hardy

Ultimate Finishing Move Showdown

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
gobbledygooker
Sister Act 2






Posts 9295
Registered 12-17-2002
Location Charlotte, NC
Member Is Offline

Mood:

posted on 3-11-2013 at 08:47 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
I was going to say, I think Raw would be the only one worth even rating at this point considering the other two shows don't even consistently get threads (and in Smackdown's case, if it does, it gets about six-to-eight posts on a good week).

EDIT - Jesus, I just saw this thread started a month ago. I'm thinking the consensus is nobody cares.

[Edited on 3-11-2013 by gobbledygooker]





"Hulk Hogan have the sex with some dumb bitch on the TV. The girl smart if she make the $$ from his bald ass but she also desperate to have sex with the howdy doody like Hulk Hogan. He worse than Mel Gibson and I think now %10000 he prove he have grasshopper dick and raisin balls." - The Iron Sheik

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
OORick
If There Was Ever a Time






Posts 3737
Registered 12-27-2001
Location - The Birthplace of Aviation
Member Is Offline

Mood: The Time is Right

posted on 3-12-2013 at 05:21 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
As I mentioned in the other thread: sorry I didn't really realize this was an ongoing thread till now...

But now that I see it, I agree the present show threads are a bit silly, in regards to the "rating' aspect. Let's say we just -- for the sake of tradition -- keep things how they are for a couple more weeks, and use WrestleMania as the excuse to shake things up.

RAW really is our best, weekly thread; even with "lurker blocking" technology we're doing about 100 replies and 10,000 views per week. I don't think we need anything to change there.

SD and Impact, though? I'm open to suggestions. SD seems to be on a slight uptick, lately, but that might just be WM Season. I like the idea of talking about shows, but TNA is still TNA (which is not a compliment), and unless we completely change how we deal with Spoilers, I don't know how much interest we can ever generate in SD...

I suppose wmmssssss point is that we just need to knock out the boilerplate verbiage on the TV threads.... and in so far as that goes, I'm amenable. It's clearly no longer fair to try to use the same scale to rate RAW vs. SD vs. Impact, whether that scale is Nielsen points or Arbitrary OO Points.

Short of making me write huge TNA previews each week, pretending as if I considered it to be a valid replacement product, what can we do to remedy this?


Rick






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top


Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.0436821 seconds, 20 queries